Let’s be honest. Most “link building” is a total grind. It’s this necessary evil, a part of SEO that’s mostly cold emails, guest post farms, and staring at a spreadsheet full of rejections. You’re building at people, not earning with them. I was stuck on that hamster wheel myself for years, celebrating a DA 40 link like it was a grand slam. All the while, I knew there had to be a better way.
The truth? There is a better way.
It’s called Digital PR. And using digital PR for backlinks isn’t just another tactic. It’s a total shift in thinking. It’s what separates “good enough” SEO from truly great, authoritative brand-building.
This isn’t just PR in the old-school “brand awareness” sense. This is about building campaigns so newsworthy, so interesting, and so genuinely helpful that high-authority news outlets, .edu sites, and top-tier blogs want to link to you. They link because you’re not asking them to, or paying them, but because your content makes their content better.
That’s the magic.
This shift in thinking is what lands you the “ungettable” links. You know, the ones from major news publications that your competitors can only dream about. So, here’s my promise: no fluff. I’m pulling back the curtain on the entire strategic process. We’ll go from the ‘what if?’ idea stage all the way to outreach, and I’ll be sharing my own hard-won victories—and just as many face-plants—from my time in the trenches.
More in Off-Page SEO & Link Building Category
How To Use Broken Link Building For SEO
Link Building Vs Link Earning Strategy
Key Takeaways
Before we get into the weeds, here’s the quick-and-dirty breakdown:
- It’s Earning, Not Asking: Forget traditional link building’s ‘please link to me’ begging. Digital PR earns links. You do this by creating stories, data, or assets so good that journalists and publishers actually want to cite them.
- A Huge E-E-A-T Signal: When you earn these high-authority links, you’re sending a massive signal to Google about your Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust (E-E-A-T). A trusted source is editorially vouching for you. That’s gold.
- Focus on the Story, Ditch the Sales Pitch: The best campaigns? They almost never mention the product. Instead, you use your brand’s expertise to tell a bigger story—about your industry, a cultural trend, or a fresh data insight.
- Quality Over Everything: One single link from a DA 80+ news outlet is worth more than 100 links from those spammy guest post farms. Period. This game is about the quality of the placement, not just counting links.
- The ‘Angle’ Is Your Secret Weapon: A brilliant piece of content can absolutely bomb if you pitch it with the wrong angle. How you frame the story for a journalist is often more important than the asset itself.
So, What’s the Big Deal? Isn’t “Digital PR” Just a Fancier Term for Link Building?
I hear this all the time. And look, I get it. The end goal is the same: get high-quality backlinks. But the way you get there? Night and day.
Here’s the analogy I use: Traditional link building is door-to-door sales. You’re just asking, “Can I put my flyer in your window?” You’ll get a few “yes” answers from small shops, sure, but you’ll mostly get doors slammed in your face.
Digital PR, on the other hand, is like staging an incredible event right in the town square. It’s so interesting, so valuable, that the local news shows up with cameras. They want to interview you. They want to tell everyone else to check it out.
You’re no longer the pest; you’re the headline.
The real, practical difference is the asset. Most link building hinges on “linkable assets” that, if we’re being honest, only other SEOs find linkable. You know, the “Ultimate Guide to X.” That’s fine for ranking, but a journalist at Forbes? They’re never linking to it. Why? It’s not a story.
Digital PR creates newsworthy assets. These are different. They’re designed from day one to be the story. They give a reporter new information, a surprising stat, or a hook into a conversation people are already having. This is the big pivot. You stop asking, “Who can I beg for a link to my post?” and you start asking, “What can I create that a journalist would actually thank me for?”
How Does Google Even View These Kinds of Links?
This brings us right to E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). For years, Google’s been shifting. They’ve moved away from just counting links and toward link quality.
When a high-authority site like a major newspaper, a government (.gov) site, or a university (.edu) site links to you, it’s not just passing “link juice.” It’s a huge editorial vote of confidence. It’s a trusted institution telling Google, “This brand is an expert. We trust their data. Their information is authoritative.”
This is the holy grail of off-page SEO.
Using digital PR for backlinks is, bar none, the most effective way to build these E-E-A-T signals. You’re not trying to game the algorithm. You’re aligning with its core purpose: to reward and surface content that people can actually trust. These links last. They can even insulate your site from those dreaded algorithm updates that crush low-quality link schemes.
Why Do So Many Traditional Link Building Tactics Feel… Icky?
Because many of them are. We’ve all been on the receiving end. The “Dear Webmaster” emails. The pitches that prove they’ve never read a single article on your site. The shady offers to “pay for a do-follow link.”
It’s all transactional. It’s low-value. And you know who hates it most? Journalists.
Reporters at major publications get hundreds of these spammy pitches every single day. When you engage in those tactics, you’re not just getting ignored; you’re actively burning bridges. You’re training that journalist to auto-delete any email that comes from your domain.
Digital PR is the antidote to this. It’s relationship-based. It’s value-first. When you send a pitch to a journalist, you’re not asking for a favor. You are offering them a story. You’re handing them a unique data point, a compelling graphic, or an expert quote that makes their job easier and their article better.
It’s a collaboration, not a cold-call.
Where Do You Even Begin? Do You Just Create Something and Pray for Links?
This, right here, is the biggest hurdle: coming up with the idea. A killer campaign is 90% strategy, 10% execution. “Praying for links,” or what we call “spray and pray,” is the fastest way I know to waste six weeks of your life.
You can’t start with just a “cool idea.” You have to start with a question: “What conversation is already happening that my brand has a genuine right to be a part of?”
Your goal is to find the sweet spot, that perfect intersection of three things:
- Your Brand’s Expertise: What do you know better than anyone? (e.g., a real estate company knows housing trends; a tech company knows about advertising).
- A Newsworthy Hook: What’s timely? Surprising? Emotionally resonant? (e.g., cost of living, remote work, mental health, a new data trend).
- A Target Audience: Which publications do you want links from? (e.g., finance, lifestyle, tech, local news).
The best ideas live right in the middle of that Venn diagram. For example, that real estate company could run a data study on “The Top 10 Cities for Gen Z Renters, Based on Walkability and Nightlife.” This is a story a lifestyle or local news reporter can easily run with.
What Kinds of “Stories” Actually Attract Top-Tier Journalists?
Not all content is created equal. A great blog post is your home base, but it’s not a PR asset. For that, you need a “hero” piece. This is the big, linkable thing your entire campaign will be built around.
These campaigns generally fall into a few successful buckets:
- Data-Driven Reports: This is my personal favorite. It’s also the most reliable. You can survey a group of people (e.g., “We Surveyed 1,000 Americans on Their ‘Financial Red Flags’ in Dating”) or analyze internal/public data (e.g., “Analyzing 50,000 Job Postings to Reveal the Fastest-Growing Remote Work Skills”). Journalists love new data. It lets them be the first to report on a new trend, and they must link to you as the source. It’s a beautiful thing.
- Interactive Tools & Calculators: These are fantastic for “utility” links. Think: “How Much Do You Need to Retire in Your State?” or “What’s Your ‘Digital Footprint’ Score?” These assets give direct, personal value to the user. Lifestyle and personal finance writers love them because they’re a great, interactive element for their readers.
- Emotional & Human-Interest Angles: These campaigns tap into shared experiences, nostalgia, or even a little controversy. An example could be a project visualizing “The Most Misremembered Brand Logos” (the Mandela Effect) or a campaign on “The Most Complained-About Movie Endings.” These are fun, super shareable, and perfect for entertainment and culture sites.
- Expert Commentary & “Newsjacking”: This is more of a reactive strategy. When a big story breaks in your industry (like a new Google update or a major merger), you can piggyback on it. You get your expert’s “hot take” or analysis ready and pitch it to journalists who are already writing about that topic. You’re not the main story, but you’re the expert source they quote. And you get the link.
The key for all of these? You’re providing primary value. You’re not just commenting on the news. You are the news.
Can I Share a Story? My Biggest “Failure” Taught Me Everything About Angles.
I want to tell you about a campaign that nearly fell flat on its face. It taught me more about using digital PR for backlinks than any of my successes.
My team and I were working for a mid-sized financial services client. We decided to go big with a data-heavy campaign. We spent weeks analyzing public datasets to determine the “True Cost of Starting a Small Business in Every State.” We had it all: state-by-state breakdowns, shiny infographics, a 5,000-word report. We were incredibly proud of it.
We launched. And… crickets.
We pitched it to national business publications, finance reporters, and small business blogs. We got a few polite “no thank yous” and a whole lot of silence. We were devastated. The client was getting… antsy.
I remember just staring at the data one evening, totally demoralized. Why didn’t anyone care? The report was comprehensive! It was useful!
Then, my colleague, looking over my shoulder, pointed to one tiny data point we’d almost included as an afterthought. It was the average cost of a cup of coffee in each state’s capital, which we’d used as a “color” metric for daily expenses.
He said, “I wonder if we could pitch this to lifestyle editors.”
A lightbulb went off. We had the wrong angle. Business reporters didn’t care about our report because it was too broad. It wasn’t “news.” It was just… a bunch of data.
So, we pivoted. Hard.
We created a new, simple graphic that only showed the coffee-cost data. We wrote a brand-new pitch with the subject line: “Your Daily Coffee Habit Costs More Than Your Business Software in These 10 Cities.”
We sent it to a completely new list: lifestyle reporters, personal finance bloggers, and local city news outlets.
The response was immediate. It was like a dam broke.
We got links from major city newspapers (“Chicago Ranks #3 Most Expensive City for Coffee Lovers”), personal finance sites (“How Your Latte Habit is Draining Your Savings”), and even a few lifestyle magazines. The original, “failed” report ended up landing over 40 high-authority links. All because we stopped pushing the story we wanted to tell and started telling the story the media wanted to write.
The lesson? The asset is just the starting point. The angle is everything. You have to be flexible enough to find the real story, even if it’s not the one you set out to create.
You’ve Built It. How Do You Get Them to Come?
This is the part everyone gets wrong. They spend 100 hours on a beautiful asset and 10 minutes on a “spray and pray” email to 500 journalists. This will always fail.
Your outreach needs just as much strategic love as your content. You have to find the right people and give them a pitch they can’t ignore.
How Do You Find the Right Journalists (and Not Just “Any” Journalist)?
Look, your goal isn’t to find “anyone who writes about business.” Your goal is to find “the one journalist who wrote about remote work productivity last week.”
Specificity is your superpower.
My personal toolkit is a mix of pro tools (like Cision or Muck Rack) and plain old Google News. I’ll search for my core topics and see who has written about them in the last 3-6 months. This tells me they are actively covering my beat.
But I don’t stop there. I read their articles.
- What’s their tone?
- Do they use data?
- Do they link out to sources?
- What’s their unique “spin” on the topic?
That 10 minutes of research? It’s non-negotiable. It’s the difference between a pitch that says, “Hey, I saw your article on [topic]” and one that says, “Hey, I saw your article on how remote work is affecting productivity for Gen Z. I loved your point about ‘digital presenteeism.’ Our new study actually found a direct correlation between this and a 30% rise in burnout, which I thought you’d find fascinating.”
See the difference? One is spam. The other is a solution.
Is “Building Relationships” With Journalists Just a Cliché?
No. It’s the entire game. But most people misunderstand what it means.
“Building a relationship” does not mean taking a journalist to lunch or schmoozing them at a conference. These people are incredibly busy and deeply skeptical of PR folks.
It means being a resource, not a requester.
Let me tell you a story about the “long game.” There was a very high-profile tech reporter at a major national publication I wanted to connect with. He was the white whale for my client. I knew a cold pitch would be deleted instantly.
So, I played the long game.
I followed him on X (formerly Twitter) and LinkedIn. I read everything he wrote. One day, he posted an article about a niche topic I happened to know a lot about. I sent him a very short email. It said something like, “Hi [Name], loved your piece on [niche topic]. One thing I’ve seen from my side is [one-sentence unique insight]. Just a thought. Keep up the great work.”
I did not pitch him. I did not mention my client. I asked for nothing.
He replied with a simple, “Interesting, thanks.”
I did this two or three more times over the next six months. Just a helpful, no-strings-attached comment when I had something truly valuable to add to his public-facing work.
Then, one day, he emailed me.
His email said, “Hey, you seem to know this [client’s industry] space really well. I’m working on a story about [topic]. Got any data or a unique angle on this?”
That, right there, is the moment. He came to me. I was able to provide him with our client’s proprietary data, which he used as the entire basis for his article, complete with a powerful, “ungettable” link.
This took patience. It took genuinely trying to be helpful. But that one link was more valuable than any 100 links I could have “built” in that same six-month period. That’s the power of using digital PR for backlinks.
What Does a Pitch That Doesn’t Get Instantly Deleted Look Like?
You have to remember, journalists are drowning in emails. Your email is an interruption. Your one and only job is to make that interruption valuable.
After sending and testing thousands of pitches, my team has found a formula that works. It’s short, it’s clear, and it’s 100% about them.
Seriously, How Long Should My Email Be?
I mean short. Painfully short. We’re talking 100-150 words, max.
No one has time to read your life story. Your pitch needs to be scannable in 10 seconds. Here’s the structure:
- Subject Line: This is 80% of the battle. It needs to be clear, not clever.
- Bad: A New, Groundbreaking, Synergistic Report
- Good: [DATA] 60% of Americans Are Skipping Lunch to Afford Gas
- Good: [STORY] Here’s What $300k Buys You in 50 Different Housing Markets
- The Personalized Hook (1-2 sentences): This is where your research pays off. “I saw your article on [topic].”
- The Core Story (2-3 sentences): What’s the headline? Don’t bury the lede. “We just ran a study of 2,000 workers and found that ‘meeting-bloat’ is the #1 reason they want to quit. The most surprising part? It’s worse in ‘fully remote’ companies than in hybrid ones.”
- The Asset (1 sentence): “You can see the full data and a few key graphics here: [link].”
- The “Ask” (1 sentence): Make it easy for them. “Happy to provide the raw data or connect you with our lead analyst. Let me know if this is interesting to you!”
That’s it. It’s respectful of their time and gives them everything they need to make a “yes” or “no” decision.
What’s the Single Biggest Mistake People Make in Their Outreach?
Besides being generic? It’s making the journalist do the work.
Never, ever send a pitch that says, “I have this great report, let me know if you want to see it!” Just send the report! Don’t make them email you back to get the thing you’re pitching. Add the link to the landing page right in the first email.
Another huge mistake is sending massive attachments. Don’t clog their inbox with your 10MB infographic. Just link to it.
Here are a few other pitch-killers:
- Vague Compliments: “I’m a huge fan of your work.” It’s empty. Be specific or don’t say it.
- Massive Blocks of Text: If it looks like a wall of text, it’s getting deleted. Use short sentences and lots of white space.
- The “Link” Ask: Never, ever say, “I’m writing to ask for a link” or “It would be great if you could link to us.” It’s implied. Asking for it explicitly makes you look amateurish and transactional. The story is the product; the link is the by-product.
Is It Okay to Follow Up, or Am I Just Being Annoying?
This is a delicate one. Yes, you should follow up. But you should do it strategically.
My rule is simple: One follow-up. That’s it.
Wait 3-5 business days. Then, reply to your original email (so they have the context) with something simple and polite:
“Hi [Name], just bringing this to the top of your inbox. Let me know if this data is useful for any stories you’re working on!”
If they don’t reply to that, they’re not interested. Move on. Pestering them further is how you get blacklisted. The only exception is if you have genuinely new information to add. For example, “Hi [Name], following up on this—we just got some fresh data for [their specific city], which I thought you might want to see.”
How Do You Know If Your Campaign Was Actually Successful?
So, you ran the campaign, you got some traction. How do you measure it?
A lot of agencies love to report that one big number: “Total Links.” That’s a vanity metric. It’s not the real story. To understand the real ROI of your Digital PR efforts, you need to look at a few different layers.
Are All Links Created Equal?
Absolutely not. This is where you separate the pros from the amateurs. I’d rather have one link from The Wall Street Journal than 100 links from low-tier blogs.
We measure success by quality.
- Authority: What is the Domain Authority (or Domain Rating) of the linking site? We aim for DA 50+ as a starting point, with a focus on landing “hero” links in the DA 70-90+ range.
- Relevance: Is the linking site topically relevant? A link from a tech blog is great for a SaaS company. A link from a random cooking blog is… less so.
- Referral Traffic: Are real, live humans clicking the link and coming to your site? This is a huge indicator of a high-quality placement. It shows the link was contextually relevant and placed in a way that encouraged a click.
What About All the “No-Follow” Links and Brand Mentions? Are They Worthless?
This is a hot debate in SEO. My answer? No, they are absolutely not worthless.
Many top-tier news publications (like Forbes, HuffPost, etc.) have a blanket “no-follow” policy on all external links. If you only measure “do-follow” links, you’ll think your campaign was a failure when, in reality, you just got your brand featured in front of 10 million people.
Here’s how to think about it:
- Brand Mentions: Even a mention of your brand name without a link is a win. Google is smart enough to connect brand mentions with your entity, which builds your overall authority. It’s a “brand signal.”
- No-Follow Links: These links still drive massive referral traffic. They still build brand awareness. And they still contribute to your overall authority profile. I will never turn down a “no-follow” link from a DA 90+ site.
True success is a combination of do-follow links for SEO juice, no-follow links for traffic and authority, and brand mentions for E-E-A-T.
How Can You Squeeze More Juice From a Successful Campaign?
A great Digital PR campaign shouldn’t be “one and done.” A single hero asset can be a content-generation engine for months.
Let’s say your data-driven report was a hit. Don’t just let it sit there.
- Repurpose It: Turn the key stats into a high-impact infographic. Create 10 different “micro-graphics” for social media. Record a podcast episode with your analyst discussing the findings.
- Spin-Off Angles: Did your national report have interesting state-level data? Great. Now you have 50 new stories to pitch to local news outlets (“Here’s How [City] Ranks in the ‘Coffee Cost’ Index”).
- Guest Posts: Use the data as a “leave-behind.” Pitch guest posts to relevant industry blogs where you expand on one specific finding from your report. It’s a new, original piece of content that links back to the original study as its source. This is a classic “link building” tactic, but it’s supercharged by your PR asset.
- Link to a Reputable Source: To further boost the authority of your own report, make sure your data is contextualized. We often cite academic or research institutions. For example, when discussing how people evaluate information, we might reference a Stanford study on how people judge the credibility of online sources to frame our own findings.
By doing this, you’re not just building links to your asset; you’re building a cluster of content around a core topic, establishing you as the go-to expert.
Is Using Digital PR for Backlinks a “Magic Bullet”?
No. It’s not magic. It’s hard work.
This is a strategic, long-term play. You’re investing in your brand’s authority. It requires creativity, patience, and a thick skin. You will have campaigns that you love, that you’ve poured your heart into, that will completely flop. It happens to everyone. My “coffee cost” story is a perfect example.
But when you get it right… it changes everything.
You stop chasing low-quality links and start attracting high-authority placements. You stop being a pest in a journalist’s inbox and start being a valuable resource. You stop “building links” and start “building a brand” that Google—and, more importantly, your customers—can’t help but trust.
Using digital PR for backlinks is a shift in mindset. It’s the decision to stop asking for attention and start creating things that truly earn it.
FAQ
What is the main difference between traditional link building and digital PR for backlinks?
Traditional link building often involves asking for links through cold emails and paying for placements, whereas digital PR earns links by creating newsworthy, valuable content that journalists and high-authority sites want to reference because it enhances their own content.
How does digital PR improve a website’s E-A-T signals?
Digital PR improves E-E-A-T signals by earning high-quality, authoritative links from trusted sources like major news outlets and educational sites, which show Google that your brand is experienced, authoritative, and trustworthy.
What kinds of content assets are most effective in digital PR campaigns?
Effective assets include data-driven reports, interactive tools and calculators, emotional and human-interest stories, and expert commentary or newsjacking content, all designed to provide primary value and tell a story that journalists want to cover.
What is the most common mistake in outreach for digital PR campaigns?
The biggest mistake is making the journalist do the work by sending vague, generic pitches, excessive attachments, or asking for links explicitly, rather than providing a short, targeted message that offers value and makes their job easier.



